View Full Version : The Second Amendment may be tested soon!
John A Roark
12-14-2008, 04:27 PM
The time for armed insurrection may well be upon us. I, like many others, do not want a war, but a war of rebellion may be the only option left, as the incoming administration and Congress have shown utterly no inclination to remain open to the voice of the people or even to the last shred of Framer's intent. Their removal from power becomes imperative.
This is why we have the Second Amendment--to depose, by force, a government no longer filling its proper function. Perhaps we may see the people take advantage of their constitutional right to bear arms in the near future.
I have to wonder how much more abuse the people will take from the swine in Washington before violence becomes inevitable. No-one wants to be first to pull the trigger--please don't let it come to that!--nonetheless, the deaths of thousands of government officials could be the outcome of the out-of-control taxes, imperious government, and bureaucratic thuggery that characterizes the chaos and corruption we observe today. Once it starts, it may spread to take the life of anyone appearing to favor anything leaning even one degree to the left.
I wish that the American people had been less willing to let their liberties go piecemeal and thus send us down the long, gentle slope to such an upheaval as we may see within the decade's end.
Jefferson told us that a little rebellion now and then was a good thing...but a BIG rebellion looms, with all the pain, blood and violence that accompanies it. I advise all prudent citizens to prepare themselves for the coming conflict--I can no longer see how it might be avoided.
kerrin
12-14-2008, 08:21 PM
“Better to die standing, than to live on your knees.”
Che
John A Roark
12-15-2008, 06:59 AM
Che Guevara was a poser, and a plagiarist to boot. Cicero said that thousands of years before Che could wipe his own nose.
I'm almost ashamed that a swine like that should be quoted in this forum.
No offense to you personally, kerrin, but, really...
kerrin
12-15-2008, 07:01 AM
Che Guevara was a poser, and a plagiarist to boot. Cicero said that thousands of years before Che could wipe his own nose.
I'm almost ashamed that a swine like that should be quoted in this forum.
No offense to you personally, kerrin, but, really...
Oh, I was just messin' with ya! :D
John A Roark
12-15-2008, 07:05 AM
LOL, I 'spose
Che Guevara was a poser, and a plagiarist to boot. Cicero said that thousands of years before Che could wipe his own nose.
I'm almost ashamed that a swine like that should be quoted in this forum.
No offense to you personally, kerrin, but, really...
Posing wasn't the issue. He would have innocent random people pushed to their knees and use them for target practice.
John A Roark
12-16-2008, 07:04 AM
And he would have had no problem since their was no kind of arms freedom guarantee in place...
How soon until Barry Hussein and his gang of thugs use their soi-disant "civilian military" to kidnap and murder citizens in the night, with no supervision, no habeas corpus, no trial, just terror?
And he would have had no problem since their was no kind of arms freedom guarantee in place...
Guarantees make it OK to kill people? ;)
How soon until Barry Hussein and his gang of thugs use their soi-disant "civilian military" to kidnap and murder citizens in the night, with no supervision, no habeas corpus, no trial, just terror?
I don't see it happening. Barry is too docile.
John A Roark
12-21-2008, 03:15 PM
No, dear, you misunderstand--since there were no guarantees in place to protect Cubans' freedoms, Che had no problems doing what he did.
LOL @ Barry being docile...
...but I think he's just chickenshit. Once he feels secure enough, with enough protective measures in place, he'll turn into a classic bully from his well-guarded position.
Right now, the people's sense of liberty is too strong--he has to undermine that, and provide for failsafes to secure his regime once they start violating that liberty.
Sorry. That should have been "Lack of guarantees...."
ExpaFr
12-30-2008, 09:43 AM
I know what the 2nd amendment mean, I am one of defender.
There is a lot of corruption today. Are you surprise? I am not
Since the politiques people are supported and almost elected by huge corporation businesses you will see monopoly and corruption, and you will not be able to get the freedom. When pressure on people for gas, food and taxes will be not acceptable, conflict will arise. What if the congress desarm honest citizen and 2nd amendment rights?
They will do what ever they want, when they want. See what happen in the socialist Europeen countries, every year there is more taxes, more employment destructions and more people in the street by millions. Oh I forgot corruption is high, they vote themself raise, salary increase and let their own people struggle with their misery.
Socialism it's a lie! no thanks.
When tough time is coming, criminality follow. Who can protect the honest citizen with immediat threats? Armed citizen, why? Because you cannot put a cop behind each citizen to control their behavior. That's why I like very much the 2nd amendment.
It is much better to be prepare even if you never use it.
As far as to depose by force a government it seems extremism in occident, there are democratic tools for that.
eternaltraveler
02-03-2009, 11:49 PM
Rather than violently overthrowing the US government I think I'll just leave once this country no longer is useful to my goals.
John A Roark
02-04-2009, 08:04 AM
Hmmm... "I swore 'til death do us part to this woman, but I think I'll just divorce her once she no longer serves my ends."
Hmmm... "I've worked for seven years for this company and the boss has bent over backward for me. But they're in tough times, and I think I'll seek employment elsewhere once these people no longer have the means to help me toward my goals."
Hmmm... "That's my buddy over there in the next foxhole, but enemy fire is getting hotter... I think I'll abandon him to his fate once he can't help me toward my goal any longer."
If you aren't willing to buckle down to the grit in helping set this nation back to the right course, even to the worst if the worst comes, why not just flee now?
eternaltraveler
02-04-2009, 11:16 AM
"I swore 'til death do us part to this woman, but I think I'll just divorce her once she no longer serves my ends."
I was born here, I didn't swear fealty to this land.
"I've worked for seven years for this company and the boss has bent over backward for me. But they're in tough times, and I think I'll seek employment elsewhere once these people no longer have the means to help me toward my goals."
of course? That's called capitalism. Are you suggesting a person is somehow honor bound to work for the same employer for life? I'd of course give plenty of notice just like I did when I decided to quit my job to go to medical school. My employer wished me the best of luck.
"That's my buddy over there in the next foxhole, but enemy fire is getting hotter... I think I'll abandon him to his fate once he can't help me toward my goal any longer."
I would never abandon my friends, and if I did decide to sign up for the military I the oath I would swear I would uphold till my dying breath.
If you aren't willing to buckle down to the grit in helping set this nation back to the right course, even to the worst if the worst comes, why not just flee now?
We have a something like a democracy. Americans voted for the situation they are in right now every bit as much as the Palestinians voted for hamas and are therefore suffering the consequences. The reason the government is an increasingly totalitarian behemoth is because the people seem to want it that way as they seem to have a problem with growing up. Since the people's will is being done should I, therefore, become a greater totalitarian by imposing what I think is right on them? I think it's better to let them learn their lesson, but it doesn't need to be at my expense.
John A Roark
02-07-2009, 05:07 PM
So, run...
John A Roark
12-29-2009, 03:24 PM
Way cool--my old post is gone, now, because there is no longer any need for it. The collectivist anti-gun PIG to whom I responded has either removed his post or been otherwise obliterated.
Good riddance, either way.